He tells the story of an angry
man, fresh from a tongue lashing from a client, assembling the team to pass
along in the same fashion he received it, dissatisfaction and blame for an extremely
expensive mistake. As he finishes his
tirade, sucking every bit of collaborative, problem-solving energy out of the
room, a cooler head asks if he’s finished,
and then proceeds to inform this man of his misdirected fury: This group of individuals is only the
messenger, reporting bad information. Breaches in operational protocol and a
lack of communication mean no one has eyes on the big picture; the right
questions sure to catch mistakes go unasked.
There are a couple of things
wrong with this story. First and
foremost is the fury. This man’s shaming approach does nothing but shut everyone
down. Sure, I get that he’s angry. His
head is on the chopping block; he’s not a “doer” on this
team, he’s responsible for oversight, and as
such he’s the one with the burden of
communicating the implications of this error to his superiors. But the reality is he’s responsible for much more; he’s responsible for modeling and supporting an
environment where hard questions are routinely asked, with the goal to uncover
risk before disaster strikes. Small mistakes
happen every day. Left unchecked, they can become monumental. I believe we can prevent some of them,
mitigate many of them, and solve for all them when we create environments where
we welcome constructive conversation about them.
Secondly, is the finger-pointing
behavior this fury unleashed triggers.
People automatically shift the blame; it’s a natural defense mechanism. It’s pretty
certain this team played some part in the outcome, but few are willing to make
themselves vulnerable in that admission amid public flogging.
Core to the culture of safety we
are developing in my organization is the concept of “near miss”
reporting. A near miss is defined as a
situation with potential to cause an accident, identified and corrected before
the accident ever happens. Things like addressing
improper ladder set-up before the technician climbs it, or stopping someone
without safety glasses before she walks into the lab. We track our near misses, broadcast them; reward
even, the individuals who call out these seemingly small infractions before
they cause a serious problem. I love
this behavior. It is at a very basic
level an exercise in vulnerability; one that is sorely needed in the workplace,
and evidence of an ever-so-slight shift in culture to one of constructive
collaboration through a willingness to speak openly of failures.
We could easily go the other
way. We could track these same
near-misses negatively, dock pay, or invoke performance plans, but instead we
choose to look at them as learning opportunities, as evidence that safety is so
important to us we speak openly about these mistakes to draw continuous
attention to risk mitigation, stressing prevention and raising awareness with
humanity top of mind. We empower people to learn from a position where corrections
can be made before consequences become dire; their ability to make a difference
becomes visible to the team.
I can’t help but think back to the angry monologue. What
if instead this man had pulled the entire team into the room, not just the
group he views as the offenders, and explained calmly the mistake and its deep
financial implications? What if he had
asked this group of experts in the field to help him unravel and understand how
this all happened? I like to believe he’d walk away from this conversation with more ideas
then he’ll ever be able to implement to
solve this problem, and a loyal team willing to help solve any problem.
The executive oversight role can
be a struggle in business and in life. As parents, some of us wake up one day
to realize we’ve received
an unwanted promotion into this position.
Our young adults are making their own decisions now, and we feel a bit
powerless, no longer calling all the shots. Do we breeze in periodically to take them to
lunch, or hold the perfunctory check-ins so we can walk away reassured we’re all good?
Or do we roll up our sleeves, teaching them how to assess and manage the risks inherent in life by asking the tough questions lurking below the
surface, and listening without interjection to the answers these intelligent and
vulnerable individuals so desperately want to share?
We can make a difference no
matter where we are in the food chain.
At the top we set the tone. Are you yelling?